Thursday, October 20, 2011
First Peer Review compared to Second Time
Well, even though I didn't like how much more effort I had to put into this review, I think it was more effective then the first time around. This time we had at least two other people reviewing our papers which allows for more depth in analysis. Also with two people there is different perspectives that give opportunity for more critique so that we can develop are papers more effectively. Having each of our groups papers allowed us to have time to read over a look with great intent on where we thought changes could be made. All-in-all I would say this time around was better then the first.